Comments
on
Nature
and Civilisation
I
After
us, the Deluge,
Vlad.
Parkhom
Hi
Vladimir,
your
text reveals many ideas and conclusions which sound familiar
to my understanding of our existence. What pleases me very
much is your emphasizing about human life being a task and
not just being fun without any chance for satisfaction.
Thank you very much for having suggested your opus to me.
The
whole universe is built upon only a few physical laws and
constants. And only due to their highly specific character
(anthropic principle) the universe expanded the very way it
did after the big bang - and still it does slowly, preparing
and keeping Life-favourable conditions on earth and may be
elsewhere too.
Those
laws are inherent to everything, even to God watching the
whole situation and may be waiting to manifest him/herself
by evolution.
Everything
went fine so far except for the moment humankind came into
the game. Whereas all Life before the new development was
bound directly to DNA's order or indirectly to DNA based and
serving instinct - humankind is not so. We are free. That
means we are lost or we are voluntarily as bound to Life as
all living beings before us. All left to our own decision.
We are free to think and act either way.
The
new evolutionary development is the two halves of brain's
hemispheres together with new organs to think and speak and
to act. The two halves of the new brain act as mirrors which
have to reflect existence. Human brains aim is to reflect
existence in an authentical way, that is as it is:
productive, cooperative and creative.
In
order to achieve this goal humankind is fighting it's way
through history, through ideologies and through religions
only to form, condition and prepare human consciousness and
awareness about it's total responsability (in respect to
it's creating laws). I name this "fight" the evolutionary
Learning Process of humankind.
The
Learning Process of the new species bears a high risk for
mother Nature as she herself becomes object of human
investigations. Under regular conditions the Learning
Process is kept alive and moving by ratio and sensibility
(by thinking and feeling), both at the same time. Indigenous
peoples still were aware of this necessity of Life. They
would use their brains and their moods by dancing and other
trance techniques to enhance the possibilities of sleep in
preparing compatibility between actual life and Life in
general.
Sleep,
dream and trance are tools to keep us tuned on the right
path of Life (may be it is during those phases of life that
individual gain is being transferred to DNA structure -
although this would contradict Crick's tabu and the verdict
over Lamarck).
However
as soon as ratio is dominating over sensibility as it
happens to be in all patriarchate societies further
development becomes dangerous and destructive. An artificial
world is being built against real nature, nature "even has
to be improved", power is dominating justice, money becomes
the GOD to rule over everything else, money and material
gain are being worshipped dispite to the sacrifice of Life.
Civilisation as being represented by patriarchate is
endangering the creativity of DNA, it's healthiness and it's
creativity for further complexity.
Speech
- also a new feature of our species - is a powerful
instrument as words may represent virtually anything, so we
are taught by research on hypnosis. Due to their mighty
powers it is indispensable to have words represent an
authentical order. That concerns our way of thinking and our
conception of the world, both have to reflect reality as it
is - not as we want it to be or think it might be. All of
this is part of the Learning Process, it is the most
vulnerable part as it is frequent object to manipulation by
the interests of power.
The
main problem today is power and lack of sensibility, both of
which are obstacles to the progress of human Learning
Process towards a complex growing awareness of: being ONE
humankind, being completely responsable for nearly
everything happening on Earth and being obliged to obey and
follow Creative Law. We have to overcome national borders
and egoistic interests, we must develop our social instinct
globally in order to survive.
Evolution
tries to keep up with man made progress. That also implies
that all man made creations (Technaea) are forced to be
compatible with Creative Laws. We have to reset ourselves
and our products to Creative Law Conditions, otherwise there
won't be any future for us.
This,
of course, is a political challenge. What can be done
individually? We have to put into question our comfortable
habits, nearly everything, and prove their compatibility in
respect to social progress in a global dimension. We might
spread awareness of being only a part of a huge creatively
functioning system called GAIA. We might share the idea that
evolution did not stop yet but still is willing to create
new dimensions of complexity, may be even a new
metamorphosis (there already have been so many before). It
certainly could even be the metamorphosis of God's Self,
waiting to take place as soon as we give way to a real
creative and loving world. We are responsable, knowing or
not knowing!
------
Vlad.,
you expressed quite a strict opinion about sex and the use
of sex. I guess in case one's life is well balanced we are
also allowed to create bodily pleasures to each other
without the obligatory consequence of making a babies. The
responsable use of our bodies' sources of pleasure do not
harm anybody, be it heterosexual, autosexual or homosexual -
on the contrary: it helps to keep well balanced.
Abortion
certainly is a severe act which should be under close
control having in mind all the concerning consequences.
Abortion certainly can't be an instrument of birth control
or even used as a production of pharmaceutical resources -
as it is practised at many places nowadays. Child
construction under laboratory conditions is the next item
which should be thought of to be stopped. All technical
development in this direction leads to a dead end road as
humankind interferes with evolutionary laws and necessities.
DNA
research may be fine for screening some really "no future"
disabilities. It also may be fine for genetically produced
replacements (hormons like insuline, organs etc.). The
problem on this field is the same as everywhere: as long as
human help is being tried to be found in a human way it
might be o.k. - however, as soon as money interests
interfere, risky results are being suppressed in favour of
the object to be merchandised.
Dear
Vlad. - I do hope my open answer to your text is being
accepted. Please do answer and argue in case needed. It is
very rarely to find people like you. Most of our companions
are occupied only with what they think is their struggle for
life. Some really have to struggle. However most of the
people in those countries the rich contries consider to be
their "natural resources" do not even have the chance to
think.
Yours,
Wolfgang, 8.3. 2000
Subject: link
Date: 19 Mar 00 20:17:23 EST
From: Love1133 <love1133@usa.net>
To: Impressum
Greetings
Because
of relevant information found on certain pages of your
website, http://emanzipationhumanum.de/english/nature.html
a link towards your site has been added at URL
http://www.global.leader.homepage.com/linksoci.html
On
that page your link has position #30
This
link to your site is additionally mirrored at the following
domains: http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/orwell/1133/
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atlantis/4124/
, http://members.tripod.com/WeltSchmied/
, http://members.xoom.com/leadership4u/
If
you feel supportive for Evoluting Earth, and if it is within
your means please link back.
may
love and wisdom prosper in your life
Love1133
(Web
designer, Evoluting Earth site)
Emanzipation
Humanum,
version 3. 2000, Criticism, suggestions as to form and
content, dialogue, translation into other languages are all
desired
http://emanzipationhumanum.de/english/comment.html
|